Piaget’s stages of development follows four
sequential stages which begins at birth and stretches across a person’s
lifetime. At each stage the learner is
achieving cognitive development and building upon their past experiences in
order to understand the present cognitive challenges.
Similarly, James states, “That something
can consist in nothing but a previous lot of ideas already interesting in
themselves, and of such a nature that the incoming novel objects which you
present can dovetail into them and form with them some kind of logically
associated or systematic whole.” (p. 49) In essence, James is expressing that
humans make associations with information and build upon their prior knowledge
just as Piaget’s stages of development follows a cognitive progression. James statement also supports cognitive constructivism
because it follows the idea that students are “active” learners that assimilate
or accommodate information as they learn.
I think there are closer connections to be made between James and Piaget. You might for example revisit the "law of transitoriness in instincts."
ReplyDelete