I can connect to the Math Needs a Makeover discussion because
I’ve worked with students that have a lack of initiative and an aversion to
word problems. I agree with Dan Meyer, that the curriculum being taught doesn’t
teach students how to problem solve but rather creates impatience with
resolution. Many of my past students
simply wanted a math formula and were reluctant to converse about math problems
or attempt to think or even solve the problem.
This also makes me think about the information processing perspective
that problem solving is analogous to learning. Therefore, when students aren’t
able to problem solve or refuse to, they stop the process of accommodation and
learning doesn’t take place.
I found Tom Wujec’s results in the Marshmallow
Challenge, interesting and relatable. The kindergarteners performed very well
on the challenge because their approach was better than the businessmen. Also,
according to the cognitive constructivist perspective, students are active
learners that construct knowledge based upon past experiences. The kindergarteners most likely had prior
experience building and used those skills during the challenge. In addition, the social constructivist
believe that social interaction is important in the process of learning and
development. In this activity, the
children were able to use prior knowledge and discuss their ideas with one
another. First, I was surprised that the children out preformed the business
men, but similar to my own experience as a teacher, students often have hidden
skills and or experiences outside of the classroom, which the teacher knows
nothing about.
What was it about the children's approach to the problem that made them successful problem solvers? This is an important point to consider in light of what leads to effective learning outcomes.
ReplyDelete